Affiliate marketing has the potential to significantly boost your revenue, but you might find yourself considering whether to team up with an agency or to grow an internal squad. The best route really depends on your goals, budget, and vision for the future. Bringing the affiliate program in-house gives you tighter control over tactics and relationships, though you’ll have to invest in trained managers and solid tracking software. Going with an agency, however, can get you up and running fast with their existing networks and know-how, even if it sometimes limits the level of adaptability you have. We’ll start by looking at the pros and cons of both approaches, break down the costs tied to each, and conclude with some hybrid options that combine the best of both worlds.
Why Businesses Choose Affiliate Marketing Agencies
For many businesses, joining an agency allows them to have immediate access to their relevant skills, connections, and tried-and-true techniques. Instead of managing affiliate work on their own, companies can use the resources and expertise of an agency. Instead of targeting one field, the agency brings a whole unit that specializes in onboarding affiliates and campaign optimization while also ensuring industry standards are met.
With time management, the agency saves the business owner time. Onboarding is only one of the many tasks that come with managing affiliates alongside tracking engagement, managing payouts, settling disagreements, and offer setting. An agency takes these duties, which allows marketing teams to have time to focus on other parts of the business.
In e-commerce, agency-driven growth can be seen scaling operations. One online fashion retail store partnered with an affiliate marketing agency and increased its revenue by 40% in 6 months. The agency was already connected to high-converting affiliates, which is why they were able to spend money on complex fraud detection systems that the retailer could not.
The Challenges of Working with an Agency
Agencies are beneficial in many aspects; however, they have their downsides too. The primary one is cost. Agencies charge either a monthly retainer, a performance-based fee, or a combination of both. For newly started businesses or smaller firms that do not yet earn significant income through affiliate marketing, these fees can be overwhelming.
Another challenge is control. For the sake of efficiency, you are outsourcing the management of your affiliates, which also means that an external firm participates in the management of your brand’s reputation. This automatically slows communication and reduces direct oversight. For example, a SaaS firm that worked with an agency to manage its affiliate program was surprised by the response times affiliate respondents were promised to follow. Many prospective affiliate partners were lost due to the delays surrounding most responses. There was a lack of interface between the brand and the affiliates, which, with a team put in-house, would not have resulted in friction.
Another risk is conflicts of interest. Because agencies have several clients, their priorities may not necessarily align with your business’s interests. A fitness brand that partnered with one of the agencies later found out that some of their affiliates were also using competing products with the same agency. This reduced the brand’s competitors and forced the brand to take its affiliates program in-house.
Building an In-House Affiliate Marketing Team
An in-house team is often the preferred choice for brands that would like to have complete control over their affiliate programs. This gives businesses the ability to ensure that their affiliate marketing programs are consistent with their internal processes. They also tend to get a lot of direct contact with the affiliates, which improves collaboration and extends loyalty.
One fintech startup that used an agency and later transitioned to using its own in-house team is a perfect example of in-house success. They managed to build a dedicated affiliate department, which led to a 25% cost reduction, all while maintaining revenue growth. Relying on training from internet platforms and hiring experienced affiliate managers helped them create a sustainable overpowering system which outperformed the agency-based model.
Setting up an in-house team does have its challenges, especially when it comes to recruiting the right talent. Without prior experience in affiliate marketing, the hiring process can be costly and lengthy. After the hiring, keeping up with industry trends requires constant financial commitment.
An additional challenge is technology. In contrast, in-house teams either have to buy or create their tracking and fraud detection systems. A direct-to-consumer skincare brand that transitioned from using an agency to an in-house model struggled with fraud detection in the initial months. They needed to purchase particularly tailored tools and come up with effective ways to use the data before seeing any positive change.
Comparing Costs and ROI
Cost is often the deciding factor when businesses choose between outsourcing to an agency and managing an in-house affiliate program. Hiring an agency usually means paying a monthly retainer that can range anywhere from $3,000 to $15,000, depending on the scope of services, in addition to performance-based fees. While this offers predictable costs and quick scalability, it can become expensive in the long run. In contrast, building an in-house affiliate team requires budgeting for salaries, training, and specialized affiliate management software. These costs are front-loaded but often lead to more cost efficiency once the team is fully established and aligned with company goals.
A subscription box business went through this very scenario. They initially worked with an agency that charged $7,000 per month, but as affiliate revenue scaled, they realized that hiring an internal affiliate manager at $80,000 a year would be more economical. Over time, they invested in additional hires and affiliate management tools, gradually building a dedicated in-house department. This shift allowed them to reduce reliance on third-party services while boosting ROI and maintaining tighter control over their program.
However, the decision isn’t always black and white. Some companies discover that the line between agency and in-house employees is less clear than it seems. The most effective solution often lies in a hybrid model, blending agency expertise with internal oversight. This approach allows businesses to benefit from external connections and resources while keeping core strategy and brand alignment in-house.
Decision-Making Framework
When weighing the choice between an agency-run affiliate program and an in-house setup, the first step is to clarify your budget and the return you’re aiming for. Agencies typically suit startups or brands that need to stretch limited funds, since they provide instant access to established networks and expert know-how without the overhead of hiring full-time personnel. If your organization already employs marketers who know the affiliate space, though, building an in-house team could become the more economical route over time. Growth stage is another crucial variable; emerging brands often gain an edge from the rapid setup timeline agencies offer, whereas companies in expansion mode usually value the added control and tailoring that in-house management provides. Finally, weigh the importance of fraud detection and sophisticated tracking: agencies frequently bundle these solutions, whereas an in-house framework requires you to purchase and maintain dedicated software.
The Hybrid Model – Best of Both Worlds
More and more companies are integrating freestanding software solutions into their workflows while consolidating staff. Companies like Hyperone provide automation for managing affiliates through monitoring, fraud detection, and reporting, which enables companies to control affiliates without a one-size-fits-all solution internal team.
Hyperone helps automate tasks like reporting and monitoring, which lessens the workload on agencies. A gaming company that Hyperone partnered with shifted from using an agency to a hybrid model that leveraged automation and small in-house teams. This reduced their agency budget by 50% while sustaining affiliate growth.
Affiliate management software also allows for improved scalability without significant increases in operating expenses. Take, for example, a financial services company dealing with an overabundance of fraudulent traffic. After adopting Hyperone’s AI-driven fraud prevention tools, fraudulent transactions were cut by 30% within months, improving the leads’ quality without increasing staff.
Scalability and Long-Term Growth
Scalability is a pivotal consideration when deciding between hiring a dedicated agency or bringing affiliate marketing talent in-house. The ultimate trajectory a program will take hinges not just on headcount or budget, but on how much bespoke control a brand demands at every growth stage. Agencies offer a coast-to-coast roster of affiliates at speed, while in-house teams are better at crafting deep, custom strategies that mature alongside the brand.
Agency-Led Growth in the Launch Window
Agencies suit businesses that prize the fastest climb. They plug into their nationwide affiliate ecosystems, deploy a seasoned manager, and get a campaign to live in a matter of weeks, not the months that custom legwork demands. This blitz is a boon for seed-stage startups or direct-to-consumer brands that must pull awareness forward to survive. The trade-off is that growth often comes off the shelf; agencies replicate their winning tactics across multiple brands, which keeps overhead low but dulls a campaign’s signature edge.
In-House Affiliate Programs for Enduring Success
Building an in-house affiliate program requires patience and investment, but the returns compound over time. A focused internal team can create tailored affiliate playbooks, engage personally and transparently with each partner, and ensure promotions reflect the company’s core values. This cultivated environment leads to heightened loyalty and enduring relationships—benefits that large agencies, no matter how efficient, often fail to replicate across many clients. Brands aiming for enduring market presence find that an in-house affiliate operation delivers reliable continuity and seamless alignment with broader marketing objectives.
Growth Velocity vs. Strategic Oversight
The key is balancing aggressive growth with strategic oversight. Third-party agencies can mobilize quickly, but their processes may sacrifice the bespoke nuances an in-house team can provide. Conversely, an internal setup affords more flexibility and consistency but requires greater upfront investment and time to achieve critical mass. Organizations should reflect on their current growth phase, the dynamics of their sector, and the robustness of their internal capabilities to select the path that guarantees not only immediate revenue but also sustainable, scalable success over the years.
Making the Right Choice
Every business works with different models and approaches because an agency, in-house team, or hybrid model are not one size fits all solutions. With minimal workload and effort needed from your side, agencies might fit your needs if scale is your primary goal. This type of model is great for companies that do not have the relevant skills to hire someone in-house or are looking for quick access to a large affiliate network. If you prefer having long-term cost-effectiveness and control over your program with direct oversight, then an in-house team is what you need.
For the level of flexibility some companies seek with an outside vendor, having an internal department is a big commitment. In that sense, affiliate management software like Hyperone provides a powerful option. With less effort from the user, it enables automation and high affiliate program performance through greater efficiency.
Whatever path you decide to take, automation and data-driven decisions will always remain key to success alongside efficiency. With the right strategy and tools, affiliate marketing becomes cost-effective and efficient.
Loading...
